Welcome Westlaw Books
Older Westlaw Info. Etc.
Important Court Cases
Words & Law Glossary !
5 Disclaimer and Fair Use
Z Misc Information Etc.
Guestbook Sign In Log !
A Bomb 66 Yrs Later Info.
Abortion Facts And Info.
Abuse Of Court Powers
Accident/Hit and Run Etc.
Against Seizing Children
Aggravated Assault Etc.
Aiding & Abetting Info.
Aiding & Accessory Info.
Alcohol Crimes (DUI) Etc
Alcohol Crimes (DWI) Etc
Alcohol Getting Help Info.
Alienation Of Affection
Amerasian Children Info.
American Express Refund
Animal Cruelty & Rights
Apartment Rental Scams
Anamorphosis Pics Info.
Arrest Is It Legal Arrest ?
Arson and Fires Laws Info.
Assault and Battery Etc.
Attempt Crimes Laws Etc.
Attorney Client Privilege
Background Checks Info
Bicycle Laws & Info. Etc.
Black Kittycat Law Books
Black Mail & How To Stop
Body of Missing People's
Breast Cancer Info.
 Brutality Excessive Force
Bribery Laws & Info. Etc.
Burglary Laws Info. Etc.
Cannibalism In The World
Cascade Mobile Home
Chesterfield Services Bad
Child Abandonment Etc.
Child Abuse Laws Info.
Children's Internet Act
Child Pornography Etc.
Child Support Laws Info.
C. Bradley Chinn Bad J.
Citizens Court Watch
Civil Rights Overview ?
Civil Rights Warning Etc.
Cohabitation Laws & Info.
Color of Law Abuses Etc.
Common Law Info. Etc.
Complaints & Canons Etc.
Computer Crime &  Info.
Consortium, Loss Of Info.
Conspiracy Crime Info.
 Constitution & Its Laws
Constitutional Rights Watch
Contempt of Cop Info.
Copyright Patent Trade
COURT OF APPEALS III
Court System How Works
Court Forced Labor Info.
Couches 4 Rent Sex Info
Salvatore  F. Cozza Bad
Credit / Debit Card Fraud
Crimes A-Z Get Help Now
Crimes Against Justice ?
Crimes Against A Person
Criminal Contempt Court
Criminal Investigations
Civil Contempt of Court
Crimes Against Children
Criminal Rights Violations
Cyber Bullying Info. Etc.
Cyber Crimes Laws & Info.
Date Rape Info.Sex Etc.
Dating Black Mail Info.
Dating and Sex Info. Etc.
Death Penalty Laws Info.
Defamation Libel Slander
Deposition Cindy N. Jones
Dim Witted Persons Etc.
Disability Rights & Laws
Disorderly Conduct Etc.
DISTRICT COURT INFO.
Disturbing the Peace Etc.
Do Not Call 911 Info.
Dog/Animal Bites & Info.
D.V. & Animal Abuse Etc.
Domestic Violence Etc.
 D.V. Consortium Info. !
Drug Charges & Info.
Drug Cultivation Etc.
Drug Distribution Etc.
Drugs Getting Help Info.
Drug Manufacturing Etc.
Drug Possession Etc.
Drug Trafficking Etc.
 DSHS & APS & Get Help
DUI and DWI Laws Etc.
DUI & DWI After Arrest ?
E Bay & Craiglist Scams
Embezzlement Info. Etc.
Expungement Laws Info.
Extortion Laws & Info.
Exemption From Laws
False Arrest Laws & Info
Food Poisoning Info. Etc
Forgery Laws & Info. Etc.
Forced Labor & Laws
Forced Marriage Laws
Foster Care Laws & Info.
Fraud Laws & Info. Etc.
Freedom of Speech Etc.
Friends 4 Civil Rights Laws
Gay Cock-Tail Partys
Gay Marriage Rights
Glossary of Terms/ Words
Gonzaga Law School Etc
Good Samaritan Backfires
Grant Programs Info.
Guardian Ad Litem Info.
Guardianship Laws Info.
Gun Rights In 4  U.S.A.
Habeas Corpus Laws Etc.
Harassment Laws & Info.
Hate Crimes Laws & Info.
Hearsay Evidence Case
Homeless Programs Etc.
Homicide Laws &  Info.
How To Cook Babys Info
How To File a Lawsuit !
How to Self-Publish Book
How The Courts Work
Human Trafficking Laws
Identity Theft Info. Etc.
Indecent Exposure Etc.
Injunction Rules & Laws
Insanity Defense Laws
Insurance Fraud Etc.
Intelligence Agency ?
Internet Laws Public Etc.
Internet Security Center
Jane Doe & John Doe Info.
Stephanie Doe Call 4 Help
Jaywalking Laws & Info.
Judges and Court Rules
Judical Conduct (CJC)
Judicial / Legal Corruption
Judical Picnic 9/11 Ethics
Judicial Trust Fund Info.
Jury Duty Welcome Info.
Kidnapping Laws & Info.
Law Enforcement  Powers
Laws Suits Filling Info.
Layman, Layman R. PLLP
Legal Research Internet
Lesbian Taco's Partys
Magna Carta Legal Info.
Mandatory Reporters Etc.
Manslaughter Involuntary
Manslaughter Voluntary
Mastrubation Self Sex Etc.
Medical Marijuana Info.
Mental State/ Defendant
Minor in Possession (MIP)
Miranda Rights Warnings
MIRANDA v. ARIZONA ?
Money Laundering Etc.
Most Important Info. Etc.
Motorcycle Accidents Etc.
Murder First Degree Etc.
Murder Second Degree Etc.
Aaron M. Naccarato Bad
NAI BLACK & Jim Orcutt
Naked Children Laws
9TH CT CRT OF APPEALS
No Contact Orders Info.
 Kathleen M. O'Connor B
Open Container Law Etc.
Other Pink Thing ! 1973
Other White Meat/ Baby
Panhandler Ordinance
Pay Pal and Misc Scams
Pedestrian Accidents Etc.
Perjury In Court & Info.
Permanent Injunction Laws
Photography is Not a Crime
Plea Bargains Laws/Info.
Police Brutality &  Force
Police &  FBI & CIA Etc.
Police Misconduct & Info.
Police Misc Photo Files
Polyamory Dating Rules
Polyamory Relationship
Premarital Agreements
Probable Cause Arrest ?
Probation Violation Info.
Pornography Charges
Property Crimes & Info.
Pro-Se & Self Help Info.
Prostitution Free/ Money
Public Intoxication Info.
Pyramid Schemes Etc.
Racketeering/ RICO Etc.
Rape Of  Men & Women
Rapist and Sex Offenders
Red Light Cam. Tickets
ReElect Nobody Info.
Rental Deposit Fees Laws
Resisting Arrest Info.
Retaliation After Crimes
Revenge Court Case's
Right to Counsel Laws
Robbery Crimes Etc.
Virginia B. Rockwood Bad
Rules of Evidence & Info.
Rules of Evidence Etc.
Safe Haven Laws & Info.
Same Sex Marriage Info.
Scuba Diving Rapist Info
Scam's & Frauds Elderly
Search and Seizure Laws
Search Warrant Info. Etc.
Search Engines Helper
Secret Canon 3/2 Info.
Securities Fraud & Info.
Self Defence Laws Info.
Separation Agreement !
Sex & Am I Ready For ?
Sexual Assault Laws Etc.
Sexual Orientation Info.
Sex Crimes Laws & Info.
Sexting Laws & Info. Etc.
Sexual Exploitation Info.
Sexual Slavery Laws
Shoplifting Laws & Info.
Shower Safe & New Laws
Sit and Lie Down Ordinance
Fred Van Sickle + Fed. J.
Smoking Getting Help Info.
Solicitation Laws & Info.
Spokane Bad 4 Business
Spokane Bad Local News
Spokane City Facts or ?
Spokane Dead Body Pics
Spokane Fire Dept. Bad
Spokane Internal Affairs
Spokane Ombudsman Pr
Spokane Police Guild Bad
Spokane Police Very Bad
Spokane Fireman Sex ?
Spokane Sex Clubs Info.
Starting a Business Info.
Starting a New Website ?
Stalking & Forms of It ?
Stalkers + Traits of ?
Statutory Rape Laws Etc.
Stupidity In Life People !
Suicide Get Help Now !
SUPERIOR COURT INFO.
SUPREME COURT WA
Surf The Web Safely Etc.
Tattoos and Branding !
Tax Evasion Laws Etc.
Telemarketing Scams Etc.
Terminology In The Laws
Theft / Larceny Info. Etc.
Traffic Laws & Tickets ?
Transient Shelter Laws
Transvestite Laws & Info.
Trial Rights & Laws Etc.
Trust Laws & Court Rules
United Nations Laws Etc.
United States Constitution
U. S. Constitution Laws
U.S. Constitutional Law
Unlawful Vehicle Mod. Etc.
US  CT. EASTERN  WA.
US SUPREME COURT
Vaccine & Vaccination
Valentines Day Hearings
Vandalism Laws & Info.
Vehicle Searches & Info.
Wa. State Constitution
Westlaw Arrest Story ?
Westlaw Arrest Tickets
Westlaw Books Come Out
Westlaw Books Dot Com
Westlaw Court Dockets
Westlaw Books Updates
White Collar Crime & Info.
White House Laws/ Bills
 Richard B. White Bad J.
Wire Fraud Laws Etc.
Yin and Yang Philosophy
Z  Words &  Glossary !
 
   
 


Judge Profile: Dishonorable Judge Salvatore (Sam) F. Cozza
Sam F. Cozza Co. J.
1116 W. Broadway Avenue
Spokane, Washington (Spokane Co.)
Experience & Credentials 
University Gonzaga University, B.A. 
Law School University of Washington, J.D. 
Admitted 1981 
ISLN 908142444

Member Name: Sam F. Cozza WSBA Bar #: 11609
Firm or Employer: Spokane Co Superior Court Admit Date: 5/12/1981
Address: 1116 W Broadway Ave
Spokane, WA  99260-0350
United States Status: Judicial
Phone: (509) 477-4795
Fax: (509) 477-5714

Superior Court Spokane County, WA - Dept. 6 Dishonorable Salvatore  F. Cozza
Superior Court Judge
Courtroom Fourth Floor Annex
Current Assignment: Family Law Judge
Elected: November, 1996
Judicial Assistant: John Mueller, 509-477-4795
Court Reporter: Samantha Drummond, 509-477-4413

, , , , , , , ,





Yet This Judge Ruled The Constitution for the United States of America Is Void !


THE HONORABLE PROF. ROMMEL PAISLEY WESTLAW + Pro_Se + IN THIS CASE

PAGE # 1

1 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SPOKANE
2
3 Re the Guardianship of: )
4 STEPHANIE E. DOE, )
5 An Incapacitated Person, ) NO. 98-4-01002-1_)
6
7
8 VERBATIM REPORT OF PROCEEDINGS
9
10
11 THE COURT: The Honorable Salvatore F. Cozza
12 DATE: 23 October 2008
13 REPORTER: Samantha A. Drummond, CSR, RPR
14 West 1116 Broadway, Department 6 + Spokane, WA 99260-0350
15 (509) 477-4413
17
18 FOR CHARLOTTE DOE: FOR RANDLES TOMPKINS:
19 Mr. Aaron M. Naccarato Mr. Randles P. Tompkins
20 Attorney at Law Pro Se
601 South Division Post Office Box 18010
21 Spokane, WA 99202 Spokane, WA 99228

PG # 2
1 VERBATIM REPORT OF PROCEEDINGS
2
3 MR. NACCARATO: Good afternoon, Your Honor.
4 THE COURT: Good afternoon.
5 MR. TOMPKINS: Good afternoon, Your Honor.
6 THE COURT: I will take this up here in just
7 a moment.
8 At this time, we will take up the matter of In Re
9 the Guardianship of Stephanie E. DOE, D-O-E. It
10 is case number 98-4-01002-1.
11 The matter comes before the Court under a couple
12 of issues. One, we have a motion for revision of a
13 decision made by court commissioner in this matter. The
14 decision was entered by the commissioner back on --
15 well, the reconsideration most recently was denied on
16 September 30th, and the matter was set for today's
17 docket. We also have a motion for injunction requested
18 by Mr. Naccarato on behalf of the guardian in this case.
19 Responding today is Mr. Tompkins, pro se.
20 I will give each side ten minutes in total for
21 these matters.
22 Mr. Tompkins, it is your motion for revision, so
23 you get to go first.
24 MR. TOMPKINS: Okay, Your Honor. You have
25 the documents that I --

PG # 3
1 THE COURT: I got them all.
2 MR. TOMPKINS: The twenty-one pages that I
3 placed in front of you today are in the court files from
4 over a year to two years ago, so it is nothing new. I
5 put them together so that you could actually see these
6 documents for a year, some of them two years, so that
7 way you don't have to go through a thousand page file to
8 see all of this.
9 THE COURT: Okay.
10 MR. TOMPKINS: Actually, I have asked to
11 have a hearing based on the fact that the other side
12 here has perjured themselves --
13 THE COURT: Restrict yourself as to why do
14 you think the commissioner's decision was in error.
15 MR. TOMPKINS: I was not granted an actual
16 hearing. The commissioner just signed a piece of paper.
17 There was actually no hearing to begin with. He just
18 said, You can't have a hearing. I requested a hearing
19 by law under the mandatory reporter act and the fact
20 that the mother has committed fraud with the Department
21 of Labor. She falsified claims regarding sexual assault
22 and tried to defraud the State of Washington out of
23 money.
24 This case has been in court for over three years.
25 So on the twenty-one pages here, I can actually show you

PG # 4
1 where the mother makes the statement. Then I got a
2 statement from the other side saying that that is not
3 true.
4 On page 14, on line number 2, she said, "Randles
5 has gone to the Spokane Association of Realtors trying
6 to cause damage to the guardian by making false
7 accusations. Note: The only time the guardian has
8 spoken to Randles was when he represented himself in
9 court..." On page 16, there is a letter from the
10 Association of Realtors that I have never been in that
11 office before and I did not do what she said I did, even
12 though she told the guardian program that I did.
13 On page 15, she filed a statement here with the
14 Department of Labor and Industries asking for crime
15 victims compensation, saying that her daughter was
16 assaulted on a certain date. But in the previous court
17 testimony, she said that Steve Lefler spent the entire
18 day with Stephanie on that day. So the Court actually
19 said that that was considered perjury and she falsified
20 a claim with the Department of Labor.
21 She also said I tried to obtain cell phone
22 records from the guardianship files. I was in a
23 criminal trial. The cell phone records were obtained,
24 which is copy -- page 17. That was obtained by my
25 prosecuting -- public defender obtained the records to

PG # 5
1 prove that the mother had lied, falsifying a police
2 report, stating that I called her on February 2nd, 2006.
3 I have included pages 18, 19, 20 and 21. You can
4 actually see the cell phone records of the calls that I
5 made. Even though the police report which you have, the
6 file, over a thousand pages, the guardian stating that I
7 had called her on February 2nd, I did not make any
8 calls.
9 During the criminal trial, Judge John Cooney
10 stated that all charges were going to be dropped for
11 false arrest for stalking because it appeared that all
12 files by Charlotte DOE and Attorney Naccarato in
13 the case were perjured and nothing was true. In the
14 first pages, 1, 2, 3 and 4, Attorney Naccarato actually
15 made a statement on page 6, he made a declaration here,
16 page 6 and page 7, and then I have addressed each one of
17 those issues. Page 7 says I am representing the
18 guardianship. Then I highlighted -- each page has a
19 corresponding number to what actually was said, which
20 is --
21 I can give you an example. Number four on page
22 7, Mr. Tompkins' motions are baseless seeking removal of
23 the guardian, on number four. Then if we go to page 3,
24 then I address that issue there; she had actually
25 falsified documents to the Department of Labor to try to

PG # 6
1 commit fraud to the State. So it wasn't an actual basis
2 for a motion.
3 But, anyway, if you had the time, you could go
4 through each section.
5 The other one was, Mr. Tompkins -- number six on
6 page 7, "Mr. Tompkins has already complained to Adult
7 Protective Services regarding Ms. DOE's care of
8 Ms. S. DOE. APS conducted an investigation into Mr.
9 Tompkins' baseless accusations and concluded that Ms.
10 C. DOE was not abusing Ms. S. DOE." That is not a
11 true statement. Stephanie DOE herself asked me to
12 get help for her. By law, as a licensed nurse under the
13 State of Washington, I am required to report that she
14 told me she was being abused. On page -- I have my
15 current license inside here, Your Honor. It is on page
16 --
17 THE COURT: Just to clarify, Mr. Tompkins,
18 it appears that you are not related or have any
19 relationship with this person other than --
20 MR. TOMPKINS: A past relationship.
21 THE COURT: -- other than the fact that you
22 claim a past relationship.
23 I will ask you a simple question; what business
24 is this of yours?
25 MR. TOMPKINS: She has perjured herself in

PG # 7
1 court --
2 THE COURT: No. What interest --
3 MR. TOMPKINS: It is preventing me from
4 going back to work because of her false claims. She has
5 another false claim based on perjured testimony --
6 THE COURT: As I understand it, you have
7 taken those to the higher courts, and those have all
8 been rejected in terms of your appeals, have they not?
9 MR. TOMPKINS: They are still in the higher
10 court, Your Honor.
11 THE COURT: But so far, no luck; true?
12 MR. TOMPKINS: I am in Supreme Court now.
13 THE COURT: And that is the last stop.
14 Right?
15 MR. TOMPKINS: It goes to Washington D.C.
16 after that is my understanding. I have not been allowed
17 to cross examine any witnesses or call any witnesses at
18 all on my behalf. There hasn't been any actual trial of
19 any person where we could actually cross examine
20 witnesses to go against this testimony. So even though
21 the Courts in Spokane are ruling against me, we are not
22 actually having a hearing where I can call witnesses to
23 prove that everything I said is true. I have got
24 documents right here to show you --
25 THE COURT: I will give you a minute or two

PG # 8
1 to respond. Let me hear from Mr. Naccarato.
2 Mr. Naccarato, you can address your issue for
3 injunction at this time.
4 MR. NACCARATO: Thank you, Your Honor.
5 Well, Your Honor, quite frankly, I believe that
6 the documents that Mr. Tompkins has filed speak volumes.
7 He has no business being in this file. There is no
8 relationship. He has indicated that, as a concerned
9 citizen and as a registered nursing assistant, he is
10 required by law. This issue has been dealt with by I
11 believe six courts now, all unsuccessfully on Mr.
12 Tompkins' part.
13 Point blank, he needs to let it go, drop it. He
14 continues just clogging up the court files with all of
15 this just garbage.
16 If you look at the latest documents that he just
17 filed today, he has posted Stephanie's Social Security
18 all over the place, Social Security number. It is to
19 the point now, Your Honor, where the family is just
20 terrified of anything and everything that they are going
21 to do because he continues looking at everything that
22 they are doing. He is reportedly hovering on that file
23 almost on a daily basis just waiting for some nugget of
24 information that he believes is going to magically
25 appear that is going to be the a-ha moment and show what

PG # 9
1 he has been trying to say for three years and, quite
2 frankly, hasn't done anything.
3 I cited case law and statutory authority. The
4 Yurtis case I believe is quite telling that the Court
5 has the authority to determine a litigant is vexatious
6 and bar access to the court system. If he wants to
7 continue doing this, Charlotte DOE, as the
8 guardian for Ms.S. DOE, would request court permission
9 to do so, so we can stop wasting tax dollars that are
10 going into all of these ridiculous motions, all of these
11 ridiculous filings. It is baseless. He needs to let it
12 go.
13 With your permission, Your Honor, I would hand up
14 a portion of --
15 THE COURT: I think most of that has been
16 attached to the file material.
17 MR. NACCARATO: Is this the web site
18 information?
19 THE COURT: I have seen enough there I think
20 to understand your point, counsel.
21 MR. NACCARATO: Thank you, Your Honor.
22 THE COURT: All right, Mr. Tompkins.
23 MR. TOMPKINS: I would like to make an
24 objection here first, Your Honor.
25 THE COURT: No. Just --

PG # 10
1 MR. TOMPKINS: This is a motion, Your Honor.
2 THE COURT: No more motions; your last two
3 minutes of response here.
4 MR. TOMPKINS: This motion is the fact that
5 I was not served for this injunction in a timely manner
6 and that he cannot have this here before the Court
7 today. He is supposed to be responding --
8 THE COURT: I have allowed him to join the
9 matter for argument for convenience sake, since
10 everybody is here.
11 Go ahead.
12 MR. TOMPKINS: He served me by mail. By
13 law, I am entitled to three days of mail and five days
14 of court time. Today's date is not timely on this
15 matter. This is a motion to have timely service in this
16 matter. He can't talk about that particular -- I would
17 like to present it to the Court.
18 THE COURT: You can give it to the bailiff.
19 MR. TOMPKINS: The law states that I have
20 eight days. This is not day eight. He mailed it on the
21 16th. I didn't receive it until Tuesday. I have five
22 court days plus three days by mail. I got the court
23 rules here. I have got local Spokane Court Rules,
24 Spokane County Superior Court. It is LAR 0.7. Any
25 copies mailed will be served within at least five days

PG # 11
1 plus an additional three days will be added for service
2 by mail.
3 This service is not timely. He cannot actually
4 talk today about what he just said.
5 THE COURT: Thank you.
6 This is a very unusual case, probably one of the
7 most unusual ones that I have seen.
8 Looking at Commissioner Valente's letter of
9 September 6, 2008, I quote, in relevant portion here,
10 quote, It seems that you have been persistently
11 litigating various matters with the guardian for several
12 years. It also appears you are very unsuccessful. The
13 court has issued protective orders in favor of Ms.
14 S. DOE requiring that you have no contact with her. It
15 appears you have filed similar grievances with the Adult
16 Protective Services. Frankly, it does not seem that
17 your filings serve any purpose other than to harass and
18 intimidate the guardian. The court continues to monitor
19 the financial affairs of the guardianship, unquote.
20 MR. TOMPKINS: That is not a true statement,
21 Your Honor.
22 THE COURT: You are not to say one more
23 word. I am giving my decision now.
24 MR. TOMPKINS: Thank you, Your Honor.
25 THE COURT: All right. You know, I think,

PG # 12 
1 at best, Mr. Tompkins can be characterized as an
2 intermeddler. At worst, I think you are obsessed with
3 this woman. You need to get a life. You need to leave
4 these people alone. Mind your own business. Leave them
5 alone. Your web site says it all; Spokanestalker.com.
6 That is what you are; you are a stalker. Leave these
7 people alone.
8 The commissioner's decision is upheld. The
9 injunction is granted. If you violate that injunction,
10 you are going to be a guest over at our hotel across the
11 way, and you'd better bring a toothbrush. You get me on
12 that? Leave them alone. Understood? That just calls
13 for a "yes" or 'no' answer. Do you understand what I am
14 saying? Do you understand what jail is?
15 MR. TOMPKINS: Yes, Your Honor, I do.
16 THE COURT: Leave them alone.
17 MR. TOMPKINS: I still have court cases in
18 court.
19 THE COURT: You can take them to the State
20 Supreme Court; you can take them to the U.S. Supreme
21 Court. As far as this Court is concerned, you are done.
22 Leave these people alone.
23 I will sign the order. I am telling you, if you
24 violate that, if you don't take this web site down, if
25 you keep bothering these people, you are going to be our

PG # 13
1 guest over there.
2 MR. TOMPKINS: What about my motion, Your
3 Honor, about --
4 THE COURT: That is all. Decision is made.
5 I will sign your order.
6 MR. NACCARATO: Thank you, Your Honor.
7 (End of Verbatim Report of Proceedings.)
8


LAYMAN LAYMAN & ROBINSON PLLP By:  AARON M. NACCARATO
Attorney at Law 601 S. Division Street Spokane, Washington 99202      This Is  A Dishonorable Law Firm Above + Lying In Court + Perjury Etc.

PAGE # 1
1 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SPOKANE
2
3 Re the Guardianship of: )
4 STEPHANIE E. DOE, )
5 An Incapacitated Person. )NO. 98-4-01002-1
8
9 VERBATIM REPORT OF PROCEEDINGS
10
12 THE COURT: The Honorable Salvatore F. Cozza
13 DATE: 21 November 2008
14 REPORTER: Samantha A. Drummond, CSR, RPR
West 1116 Broadway, Department 6
15 Spokane, WA 99260-0350 + (509) 477-4413
16
19 FOR THE PLAINTIFF: FOR THE DEFENDANT:
20 Mr. Aaron M. Naccarato Randles P. Tompkins
Attorney at Law Pro Se
21 601 South Division Street Post Office Box 18010
Spokane, WA 99202 Spokane, WA 99228
22
23
24
25

PG # 2
1 VERBATIM REPORT OF PROCEEDINGS
2
3 THE COURT: We are here this morning in the
4 matter of the guardianship of Stephanie DOE. It is
5 case number 98-4-01002-1. Present are Mr. Naccarato,
6 who represents the estate. Also present is Mr.
7 Tompkins, who is the subject of certain injunctive
8 action.
9 It is my understanding that the guardian here,
10 through Mr. Naccarato, is asking to lift some of the
11 restrictions that were originally placed on Mr.
12 Tompkins.
13 Mr. Naccarato?
14 MR. NACCARATO: Thank you, Your Honor.
15 That is exactly correct. The original order that
16 was issued against Mr. Tompkins prohibited him from
17 posting all web sites is what the order said. It was
18 later discovered that Mr. Tompkins actually does have
19 some, and I hate to use the term "legitimate" web sites
20 but web sites that don't deal with Ms. S. DOE, Mrs.
21 C. DOE and myself. Therefore, Your Honor, we believe
22 that that does not adequately reflect the intent of the
23 Court, that he should be allowed to maintain those web
24 sites, which I believe deal with record sales or the
25 like.

PG # 3
1 So the proposed order that we have just
2 specifically mentions the Spokane Stalker web site and
3 the Valentine's Day web site.
4 Additionally, Your Honor, the amended order also
5 will allow Mr. Tompkins the opportunity to appeal the
6 injunction.
7 That is, essentially, the difference between the
8 proposed order and the order that was originally
9 entered.
10 THE COURT: So the restriction on filing is
11 lifted so he has the ability to file notice of appeal
12 and related paperwork?
13 MR. NACCARATO: Just the appeal. The appeal
14 is the only restriction that would be lifted without
15 approval of the Court. Any other filings or such would
16 still require approval by the Court.
17 THE COURT: Thank you.
18 Mr. Tompkins, they want to lift some of the
19 restrictions on you. Is that okay by you?
20 MR. TOMPKINS: I agree with part of that.
21 She had it up there by your desk.
22 I have a motion here that I would actually like
23 you to look at that I feel the injunction was not fair
24 and should not have been issued under the guidelines of
25 the court rules without me having witnesses and a chance

PG # 4
1 to defend myself, not timely service, and the fact that
2 no bond was posted, and there was no complaint or
3 summons filed by Naccarato in this matter for a civil
4 procedure.
5 THE COURT: Anything else on that?
6 MR. TOMPKINS: I just don't know what to
7 say, per se, but I just feel like my rights are
8 violated. I think you were doing the right thing
9 possibly, but I would like it to --
10 Mr. Naccarato also came to Mr. Wall's office and
11 said that he was going to allow me to put the web site
12 back up and that he wanted a few things taken out of it.
13 He said that he thought you had overstepped your bounds
14 himself in Mr. Wall's office. Under the Constitution of
15 the United States, I do not know what your actual
16 authority is, but I do not know if you can actually shut
17 down web sites in the Philippines, Thailand, Canada,
18 because I was under the impression that this was a
19 guardianship action that you have the power to rule on.
20 I am not a guardianship; I am a third party. That was
21 my understanding. Maybe I am incorrect, but I am not
22 sure.
23 THE COURT: Anything else, Mr. Naccarato?
24 MR. NACCARATO: No, Your Honor.
25 THE COURT: One thing at a time here.

PG # 5
1 The original injunction, as it turns out, was
2 over broad. The narrowing of the restrictions as
3 requested by Mr. Naccarato is appropriate. He can deal
4 with whatever other business he wants on his web sites
5 that doesn't have to do with this guardianship or the
6 people involved in it. Certainly, he can file a notice
7 of appeal on that to be permissible, because he has a
8 right to do that.
9 Now, with regards to Mr. Tompkins' counter
10 motion, leaving aside some issues on notice and
11 procedure and things like that, I will deal with it
12 here, because I think it is appropriate to do that. It
13 was within the Court's authority to do that. It is
14 within the Court's injunctive and equity powers to do
15 that.
16 I felt that you need to leave these people alone,
17 butt out, basically, let them live their lives. It is
18 none of your business. That is about all there is to
19 it. I can't control what happens in the Philippines and
20 all that, but I can control you. That means don't put
21 anything on your web site dealing with the guardian,
22 with Ms. S. DOE, or the parties involved in it.
23 I will sign a proposed modification on the
24 injunction, and I will sign an order if you want to
25 prepare one to deny Mr. Tompkins' motions.

PG # 6
1 MR. NACCARATO: Thank you, Your Honor.
2 THE COURT: Could you send him a copy, Mr.
3 Naccarato?
4 MR. NACCARATO: I would. What I will do
5 right now is, after we get a signed copy, I will run to
6 the bar office and make him a copy of it and give it to
7 him. I know he has been mailed a copy of this prior.
8 THE COURT: I know, but if you would please
9 do that, that would be helpful.
10 MR. NACCARATO: I will most certainly do
11 that.
12 If I may approach, Your Honor?
13 THE COURT: Yes, sir.
14 I have signed the order.
15 I will ask Mr. Naccarato to prepare another order
16 just on a general order form, if you would, please.
17 MR. NACCARATO: Will do, Your Honor.
18 THE COURT: That concludes the matter.
19 If any counsel need me, I will be in chambers.
20 MR. NACCARATO: Thank you.
21 (End of Verbatim Report of Proceedings.)


PAGE # 1

1 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SPOKANE

2

3 Re the Guardianship of: )

4 STEPHANIE E. DOE, )

5 An Incapacitated Person. )NO. 98-4-01002-1

8

9 VERBATIM REPORT OF PROCEEDINGS

10

12 THE COURT: The Honorable Salvatore F. Cozza

13 DATE: 21 November 2008

14 REPORTER: Samantha A. Drummond, CSR, RPR

West 1116 Broadway, Department 6

15 Spokane, WA 99260-0350 + (509) 477-4413

16

19 FOR THE PLAINTIFF: FOR THE DEFENDANT:

20 Mr. Aaron M. Naccarato Randles P. Tompkins

Attorney at Law Pro Se

21 601 South Division Street Post Office Box 18010

Spokane, WA 99202 Spokane, WA 99228

22

23

24

25

PG # 2

1 VERBATIM REPORT OF PROCEEDINGS

2

3 THE COURT: We are here this morning in the

4 matter of the guardianship of Stephanie DOE. It is

5 case number 98-4-01002-1. Present are Mr. Naccarato,

6 who represents the estate. Also present is Mr.

7 Tompkins, who is the subject of certain injunctive

8 action.

9 It is my understanding that the guardian here,

10 through Mr. Naccarato, is asking to lift some of the

11 restrictions that were originally placed on Mr.

12 Tompkins.

13 Mr. Naccarato?

14 MR. NACCARATO: Thank you, Your Honor.

15 That is exactly correct. The original order that

16 was issued against Mr. Tompkins prohibited him from

17 posting all web sites is what the order said. It was

18 later discovered that Mr. Tompkins actually does have

19 some, and I hate to use the term "legitimate" web sites

20 but web sites that don't deal with Ms. S. DOE, Mrs.

21 C. DOE and myself. Therefore, Your Honor, we believe

22 that that does not adequately reflect the intent of the

23 Court, that he should be allowed to maintain those web

24 sites, which I believe deal with record sales or the

25 like. PG # 3

1 So the proposed order that we have just

2 specifically mentions the Spokane Stalker web site and

3 the Valentine's Day web site.

4 Additionally, Your Honor, the amended order also

5 will allow Mr. Tompkins the opportunity to appeal the

6 injunction.

7 That is, essentially, the difference between the

8 proposed order and the order that was originally

9 entered.

10 THE COURT: So the restriction on filing is

11 lifted so he has the ability to file notice of appeal

12 and related paperwork?

13 MR. NACCARATO: Just the appeal. The appeal

14 is the only restriction that would be lifted without

15 approval of the Court. Any other filings or such would

16 still require approval by the Court.

17 THE COURT: Thank you.

18 Mr. Tompkins, they want to lift some of the

19 restrictions on you. Is that okay by you?

20 MR. TOMPKINS: I agree with part of that.

21 She had it up there by your desk.

22 I have a motion here that I would actually like

23 you to look at that I feel the injunction was not fair

24 and should not have been issued under the guidelines of

25 the court rules without me having witnesses and a chance PG # 4

1 to defend myself, not timely service, and the fact that

2 no bond was posted, and there was no complaint or

3 summons filed by Naccarato in this matter for a civil

4 procedure.

5 THE COURT: Anything else on that?

6 MR. TOMPKINS: I just don't know what to

7 say, per se, but I just feel like my rights are

8 violated. I think you were doing the right thing

9 possibly, but I would like it to --

10 Mr. Naccarato also came to Mr. Wall's office and

11 said that he was going to allow me to put the web site

12 back up and that he wanted a few things taken out of it.

13 He said that he thought you had overstepped your bounds

14 himself in Mr. Wall's office. Under the Constitution of

15 the United States, I do not know what your actual

16 authority is, but I do not know if you can actually shut

17 down web sites in the Philippines, Thailand, Canada,

18 because I was under the impression that this was a

19 guardianship action that you have the power to rule on.

20 I am not a guardianship; I am a third party. That was

21 my understanding. Maybe I am incorrect, but I am not

22 sure.

23 THE COURT: Anything else, Mr. Naccarato?

24 MR. NACCARATO: No, Your Honor.

25 THE COURT: One thing at a time here. PG # 5

1 The original injunction, as it turns out, was

2 over broad. The narrowing of the restrictions as

3 requested by Mr. Naccarato is appropriate. He can deal

4 with whatever other business he wants on his web sites

5 that doesn't have to do with this guardianship or the

6 people involved in it. Certainly, he can file a notice

7 of appeal on that to be permissible, because he has a

8 right to do that.

9 Now, with regards to Mr. Tompkins' counter

10 motion, leaving aside some issues on notice and

11 procedure and things like that, I will deal with it

12 here, because I think it is appropriate to do that. It

13 was within the Court's authority to do that. It is

14 within the Court's injunctive and equity powers to do

15 that.

16 I felt that you need to leave these people alone,

17 butt out, basically, let them live their lives. It is

18 none of your business. That is about all there is to

19 it. I can't control what happens in the Philippines and

20 all that, but I can control you. That means don't put

21 anything on your web site dealing with the guardian,

22 with Ms. S. DOE, or the parties involved in it.

23 I will sign a proposed modification on the

24 injunction, and I will sign an order if you want to

25 prepare one to deny Mr. Tompkins' motions. PG # 6

1 MR. NACCARATO: Thank you, Your Honor.

2 THE COURT: Could you send him a copy, Mr.

3 Naccarato?

4 MR. NACCARATO: I would. What I will do

5 right now is, after we get a signed copy, I will run to

6 the bar office and make him a copy of it and give it to

7 him. I know he has been mailed a copy of this prior.

8 THE COURT: I know, but if you would please

9 do that, that would be helpful.

10 MR. NACCARATO: I will most certainly do

11 that.

12 If I may approach, Your Honor?

13 THE COURT: Yes, sir.

14 I have signed the order.

15 I will ask Mr. Naccarato to prepare another order

16 just on a general order form, if you would, please.

17 MR. NACCARATO: Will do, Your Honor.

18 THE COURT: That concludes the matter.

19 If any counsel need me, I will be in chambers.

20 MR. NACCARATO: Thank you.

21 (End of Verbatim Report of Proceedings.)

============================================================

THANK YOU FOR TAKING THE TIME TO READ THIS WEBSITE + I HOPE THAT THIS WEB SITE CAN HELP YOU & OTHER PERSONS WITH COURT CASE'S IN U.S.A. Etc. Also You Can E-Mail at yourcivilrights@yahoo.com You Can Also Write To Me At Rommel P. Westlaw @ P.O. Box 18010 Spokane, Washington. 99228-0010 U.S.A. My Phone Message # 509-701-5683 Or You Call Me At Work From 6am to 10pm PST & Call At My New (Washington D.C. Offices) At 202-670-LAWS (5297) + HELP OTHER By Making A Small Donation Or Help With Your Time Etc ! + Thank You ! PLEASE REMEMBER ! DO NOT TAKE THE LAW INTO YOUR OWN HANDS Get Help !

Thank You For Visiting My Civil Rights & Court Websites & Law School Helper & Info.Etc


Disclaimer of Warranties and Liabilities:
This site does not warrant the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, safety or merchantability of fitness for a particular purpose of the information contained in This site nor in any way endorse the individuals or institutions listed in This site. This site does not validate, inspect, credential, or ensure the competence of any of the providers listed or the content provided. Due diligence on the part of the consumer is required prior to contacting any providers. In no event shall this site be liable to you or anyone else for any decision made or action taken by you in reliance on such information. Any damages for any reason shall be limited to the Amount Paid to Access And This Web Site Is Free For All To See and Use. The above warranties are the only warranties of any kind either expressed or implied including warranties of merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose. The user hereby indemnifies This site fully for all actions and agrees that This site is not to be held responsible for any adverse consequences to you. Or to you in person and or to you in courts or to you and any 3rd party persons or people you help with this website.

Disclaimer: + This is A Disclaimer from the Owner of this Website + Please Read ! + Nothing Here Is To Be Construed As "Legal Advice". We Are Not lawyers, And We Are Not Pretending To Be lawyers. This manual and website and information is intended purely as a communication of information in accordance with the right of free speech. It does not constitute either general or specific legal advice. Anyone who is seeking any legal advice should consult a competent professional. Neither the author, editor or publisher or anyone guarantee that using Any of this information will result in success or protect the reader from harm. The reader must accept that risk, and thoroughly study the law before using any of this material. Readers must take full responsibility for the consequences of any actions taken based on the contents of this website manual & Information Pics hear.

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, any copyrighted work on this website is distributed under fair use without profit or payment for non-profit research and educational purposes only. Read all about Copyright & Fair Use at- http://fairuse.stanford.edu/

If you are a copyright holder who is unhappy about our promotion of your work to help others for Free ! + Please (Let Us Know) and we will happily remove it from the website if i can do so.

If you have a complaint about Westlaw Books Dot Com Content of this site, how about telling the webmaster first? You can Contact the Webmaster In Writing At P. O. Box 1144 Bonners Ferry, ID. 83805-1144 U.S.A.

Everything Written by Prof. Rommel P. Westlaw or Randles P. Tompkins or Randall C. Nutter Carries No Copyrights. Nothing I Do is for Money or "Fame". Feel free to copy, reuse, republish what I write. I don't care about attribution or credit. I Care Only About Not Shutting Westlaw Books Down and Putting As Many Bad Police Officers & Dishonorable Judges & There Agents in Prison As Possible and Per All U.S. Laws for Treason & for Violating the United States Constitution! Please Remember ! Do Not Take The Law Into Your Own Hands (Get Help) !


Our Website & logos are copyrighted to limit their use to honorable purposes. We specifically Prohibit Our Website to be associated with supremacist, sexist, or "hate" groups or purposes.

Westlaw Books Friends and allies may freely use and distribute Westlaw Books produced artwork, posters, brochures, articles, or other educational materials available on any of the websites owned by Westlaw Books P. O. Box 1144 Bonners Ferry, ID. 83805-1144 U.S.A..


In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, any copyrighted work on this website is distributed under fair use without profit or payment for non-profit research and educational purposes only. Read all about Copyright & Fair Use at- http://fairuse.stanford.edu/
We Encourage you to go to the original sources to read the Whole Story
Read all about Copyright & Fair Use at-
http://fairuse.stanford.edu/

This website is dedicated to helping people who are still serving long prison sentences received during the "ritual abuse" panic of the late eighties and early nineties. During this time, scores of innocent people were accused by overzealous social workers and police of heinous crimes against children.

In time, the hysteria subsided and most people were freed from prison (although many had spent years in prison and had been bankrupted by the process). It was discovered that the young children had been virtually brainwashed by the leading questions and repeated interrogations of social workers, therapists and law enforcement officials. Therefore, their wild testimony about animal sacrifice, devil worship, traveling in submarines, secret tunnels, and flying to secret locations where they were molested were fabrications, mostly without a shred of truth.

But incredibly, some people still remain in prison, forgotten and powerless.
"I didn't like to think about what that could do to the soul of a human being, to have to sit in a prison cell day after day for a crime you had not committed. And nothing to look forward to at the end of a day but the knowledge of hundreds more days like the one you just endured."

Permission to reproduce this material in a electronic or printout form is hereby granted free of charge by the copyright holder. Free permission to reprint the essay is granted to non-profit research and educational purposes only. and Free thought publications. All others must secure advance permission of the author through the Westlaw Books, which can be contacted at the address at the end of this file.

The following form is provided by Westlaw Books Etc., for informational purposes only and is intended to be used as a guide prior to consultation with an attorney familiar with your specific legal situation. Westlaw Books is not engaged in rendering legal or other professional advice, and this form is not a substitute for the advice of an attorney. If you require legal advice, you should seek the services of an attorney All rights reserved by this website for anything not cover above.

We try very hard to make sure that the information on this page and links to information is accurate and up-to-date. This information is presented For Your Educational Purposes Only, and not actual Legal Advice, which you would expect to receive from a Real Lawyer who hates Dishonorable persons, peoples, & judges, And Bad Court of the Lands with every fiber of his being, spends the time necessary to become familiar with your case, supplies Competent Counsel, and knows how to present a Vigorous and Effective Defense against dishonorable persons, peoples, & judges, Etc. insane wild allegations and Character Assassinations, and does not try to talk you into a Plea Bargain when you are innocent and if you are innocent stand your ground.

Lack of counsel of choice can be conceivably even worse than no counsel at all, or of having to accept counsel beholden to one's adversary." Burgett v. Texas, 389 US 109 see all court cases.

We supply All information for free. No Westlaw Books & Advocate under the westlawbooks.com Umbrella charges you for their help. You may feel free to help your advocate financially, but you are not required to do so.

Some of Westlaw Books member advocates may have 501 (c)(3) Non-profit Tax Free status many of our advocates do not, and must not represent that donations to them are to be. "Tax Free".

Westlaw Books Dot Com Does Not have a 501(c)(3) Status and will not have in the furture at all.

We don't want one because we refuse to have our self help and political activities hand-cuffed:

IRS Charities & Non-Profits Page "An IRC Section 501(c)(3) organization may not engage in carrying on propaganda, or otherwise attempting, to influence legislation as a substantial part of its activities."

Our #1 goal and intention is to connect families with current information and news. we promote many copyrighted works, and try very hard not to infringe a-pond anyone law-full copyrights.

We Want people to read the original sources In Context, so they know we aren't "making it up".

Mission Statement

Westlaw Books and association is a first amendment rights association speaking on matters of Public Concern of parents, grandparents, family rights advocates, former foster and adopted children, attorneys, law school student, licensed social workers, medical professionals, human rights and freedom advocates.

The insertion of the coercive force of government into the private lives of families, without accountability, due process, or recourse to redress the government for grievances is epidemic nationally and invariably harms families, communities, threatens our country's future and should be vigorously opposed.

We are dedicated to assisting families and their children by providing access to educational materials, news, support and information which will allow families and individuals to educate themselves on subjects of vital importance in restoring, exercising, and defending their rights and liberties. If you use our materials, we certainly would appreciate being informed.


Permission to quote statements we make and use our graphics is hereby granted without obtaining permission. We do Not copyright our quotes or graphics we create, which we Want to be widely dissembled to further the cause of Liberty and Justice for your Families and For All Families. If you use our materials, we certainly would appreciate being informed. Thank you !

Our Website & logos are copyrighted to limit their use to Honorable Purposes. We specifically prohibit our logos to be associated with supremacist, sexist, or Any "hate" groups or purposes.

Educate the public to be aware of the methods and operation of the unconstitutional insertion of government power into the family, the unconstitutional conduct of the courts in these cases;

Bring our grievances before the officials whose job is supposed to be to Fix It Our The Systems!

Promote legislation to protect the freedom of parents and children in their families
activities promotes both Advocacy and Activism Whether one is attracted to advocacy or activism is highly related to one's personality type. Both are highly important to the freedom of parents/ children.

Westlaw Books And Association Stands True To It's Founding Principles And The U.S. Constitution & To The Dec. 10/1948 Universal Declaration Of Human Rights .

Another worthy contribution on the part of Westlaw Books is We give people Help and Hope, and a method to blow off steam through our Numerous Forums when faced with these unaccountable and immune judges and state DSHS / CPS workers and are constantly denied redress of grievances by the unconstitutional and corrupt civil and family courts in U.S.A..

We have been providing the Safety Valve that is supposed to be the job of impartial Courts of Constitutional Due Process.

Public officials, ignorant of the law or paralyzed by suspicion, regularly thwart citizens exercising their constitutional right to inspect public records, a statewide audit has found. This is a Huge research project definitely worth spending some time going over. People are being denied their records all across the nation, primarily because it is the proof they are being falsely prosecuted.